Opinion

Michael v. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital of Philadelphia

  • 404 Pa. 424
  • 172 A.2d 769
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 27, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Bok
On the bench
Bell, Bok, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno
Cited by
25 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok:

I favor abolishing the immunity of hospitals for their torts but by the prospective method adopted by the late Mr. Justice Cardozo and approved by the Supreme Court of the United States in Great Northern Railway v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358 *443 (1932) : see also the lead article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 109, No. 1, issue of November, 1960.

Until a majority of this court agrees with me, I prefer to see the immunity continue. Hence my position as a member of the present majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.