Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

  • 370 Pa. 305
  • 88 A.2d 59
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 22, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Stearne
On the bench
Bell, Chidsey, Drew, Musmanno, Stearne, Stern
Cited by
56 cases

although establishment of accrual basis pension plan was prudent, over-accrual of pension fund, if proven, may be excluded from operating expenses

How later courts described this case

  • although establishment of accrual basis pension plan was prudent, over-accrual of pension fund, if proven, may be excluded from operating expenses

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne:

I dissent. I would affirm the Order on the opinion of the Superior Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.