The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7188
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JULIUS BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:00-cr-00100-WDQ-2)
Submitted: February 13, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julius Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. In his motion, Brown sought the benefit of
Amendments 591 and 599 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
Amendments 591 and 599 became effective on November 1, 2000, and
were incorporated into the 2000 version of the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual, pursuant to which Brown’s Guidelines range
was calculated. As such, he received the benefit of Amendments
591 and 599 at the time of sentencing in August 2001, and his
§ 3582(c)(2) motion was properly denied. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2