Opinion

Lynn Mendes v. Charles Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 13, 2012
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1710

LYNN ELLEN MENDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES BROWN; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-

DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.