Opinion

Craig Chestnut v. Angelina Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 30, 2011
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6676

CRAIG LATWAIN CHESTNUT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANGELINA L. BROWN, DHO; DONOVAN GREEN; JAMES TOLLISON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION INSTITUTION

TURBEVILLE CORRECTION INSTITUTION,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District

Judge. (3:10-cv-01784-RMG)

Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene Thomas,

THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG

(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.