Opinion

People v. Mount

  • 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 411
Court
New York Court of Common Pleas
Filed
Jun 15, 1823
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 49.2%

The opinion

The Court replied that it was the duty of the defendants to be present and at the bar of the Court; and in all criminal proceeding were always supposed to be; and no trial could take place without such presence, but by consent. If, therefore, the counsel for the defendants objected to calling them to the bar, for the purpose of proving them the same persons concerned in the riot the Court would be obliged to forfeit their recognizance, and so bring them up, and were proceeding to do it, when the counsel for the defendants consented they might be called from among the audience, and identified.

They were called by the crier, and the identity of Mount, Wheeler, Brown, and Weeks, fully made 'out.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.