Opinion

People v. M.S. (In re M.S.)

244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 580
32 Cal. App. 5th 1177

Court: California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Filed: Mar 11, 2019
Status: Published
Author: Yegan
On the bench: Gilbert, Tangeman, Yegan
Cited by: 28 cases
Authority: More cited than 5.1%

The opinion

YEGAN, J., Concurring:

I have signed and I concur with the majority opinion. There is no need to reach the constitutionality of the newly enacted mental health diversion statute. (See Loeffler v. Target Corp. (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1081 , 1102, 171 Cal.Rptr.3d 189 , 324 P.3d 50 .) My concurrence should not be considered an opinion that the subject statute is constitutional.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.