stating that the phrase “arising out of’ in the context of an additional insured clause in an insurance policy “focuses not upon the precise cause of the accident ... but upon the general nature of the operation in the course of which the injury was sustained”
How later courts described this case
- stating that the phrase “arising out of’ in the context of an additional insured clause in an insurance policy “focuses not upon the precise cause of the accident ... but upon the general nature of the operation in the course of which the injury was sustained”
- noting that the phrase “arising out of’ in the context of an additional insured clause in an insurance policy “focuses not upon the precise cause of the accident ... but upon the general nature of the operation in the course of which the injury was sustained”
- stating that phrase "focuses not upon the precise cause of the accident ... but upon the general nature of the operation in the course of which the injury was sustained”
- “The fact that the cause of the injury may have been [the additional insured’s] fault, or due to [the additional insured’s] negligence, is immaterialf.]”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Kupferman, J.,
dissents and would affirm for the reasons stated by Greenfield, J.