Opinion

Katz v. New York City Loft Board

  • 163 A.D.2d 207
  • 557 N.Y.S.2d 922
  • 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8367
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jul 12, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Kupferman
On the bench
Kupferman
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.9%

The opinion

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would grant the petition and annul the determination of the New York City Loft Board.

The legislative findings in section 280 of the Multiple Dwelling Law make it clear that the statute is designed to address "the increasing number of conversions of commercial and manufacturing loft buildings to residential use without compliance with applicable building codes and laws and without compliance with local laws regarding minimum housing maintenance standards”.

The purpose of the Loft Conversion Law was to legitimize residential use of former commercial and manufacturing loft buildings. (See, Matter of Vlachos v New York City Loft Bd., 118 AD2d 378 .) This building is a five-story brownstone, which was once properly for residential use and then changed to commercial use. The history of the statute makes it evident that it was not intended to apply to this type of real estate. (See, Spring Realty Co. v New York City Loft Bd., 69 NY2d 657 , appeal dismissed 482 US 911 .)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.