Opinion

People v. Scarbrough

  • 105 A.D.2d 1107
  • 482 N.Y.S.2d 197
  • 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21203
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Nov 7, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Boomer
Cited by
33 cases
Authority
More cited than 94.6%

The opinion

Order affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in denying the People’s motion to resentence defendant as a second felony offender. The burden is on the People to file a predicate felony information “before sentence is imposed setting forth the date and place of each alleged predicate felony conviction” (CPL 400.21, subd 2). The People did not file a predicate felony information either at the time sentence was imposed or in support of their motion to vacate the sentence. The court properly sentenced defendant to two consecutive one-year terms of imprisonment in satisfaction of a plea of guilty to two class D felonies (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 4). Inasmuch as that sentence was “in accordance with law,” the court is without authority to change it once the period of the sentence has commenced (CPL 430.10).

All concur, except Boomer, J., who dissents and votes to reverse, in the following memorandum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.