Opinion

61 Jane Street Associates v. Kroll

  • 102 A.D.2d 751
  • 476 N.Y.S.2d 887
  • 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18919
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jun 21, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Alexanderfollows
On the bench
Alexander, Follows
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.5%

The opinion

Alexander, J., concurs in a separate memorandum as follows:

I agree that the order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed. I do so, however, under constraint of subdivision 2 of section 235-f of the Real Property Law which forecloses enforcement of “immediate family only” clauses in residential leases. (420 East 80th Co. v Chin, 97 AD2d 390 .)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.