Opinion

S & S Media, Inc. v. Vango Media, Inc.

  • 84 A.D.2d 356
  • 446 N.Y.S.2d 52
  • 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14928
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jan 19, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Lynch
On the bench
Lynch, Sullivan
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.3%

“words should be considered, not as if isolated from the context, but in the light of the obligation as a whole and the intention of the parties as manifested thereby”

How later courts described this case

  • “words should be considered, not as if isolated from the context, but in the light of the obligation as a whole and the intention of the parties as manifested thereby”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Lynch, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm for the reasons stated by Special Term. The term “on the back of taxicabs” is susceptible of only one meaning and “[e]ffect must be given to the intent as indicated by the language employed” (Matter of Western Union Tel. Co., 299 NY 177, 184 ).

Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, and Markewich, JJ., concur with Sullivan, J.; Lynch, J., dissents in an opinion.

Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 25, 1980 and December 2, 1980, respectively, modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the first three causes of action, and, except as thus modified, affirmed. Plaintiff-appellant shall recover of defendants-respondents $75 costs and disbursements of these appeals.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.