The opinion
Titone, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum:
I have come to the conclusion that consideration solely of the offense giving rise to a detainee’s incarceration does not constitute sufficient reason for the action of a parole board in fixing either a minimum period of imprisonment or in denying release on parole (see Coralluzzo v New York State Parole Bd., 566 *849 F2d 375). I concur solely upon the constraint of Matter of Sturgis v Caldwell ( 57 AD2d 728 ), Matter of Odom v Henderson ( 57 AD2d 710 ), Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole ( 57 AD2d 955 ) and Matter of Hergueta v New York State Parole Bd. ( 63 AD2d 701 ).