Opinion

Di Giacomo v. City of New York

  • 58 A.D.2d 347
  • 397 N.Y.S.2d 632
  • 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12413
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jul 14, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Capozzoli
On the bench
Capozzoli, Lupiano, Markewich, Silverman
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.0%

Reversed by Di Giacomo v. City of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 894 (1979)

The opinion

Capozzoli, J. (concurring).

I join Justices Lupiano and

Markewich in voting for a modification of the determination below. It seems to me that the agreement represented by the letters of May 10, 1968 and May 13, 1968, Exhibits A and B respectively, is perfectly valid. Any suggestion that the city was without authority to enter into this agreement is disposed of by the case of Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington ( 30 NY2d 122 ) where it was made clear that a public employer is empowered to recognize an employee organization for the purpose of collective bargaining negotiation, so as to mutually agree on the terms and conditions of employment. That is exactly what happened in the case at bar and the city should be held to its bargain. At the very least the appellants are entitled to a hearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.