Opinion

United States v. Samuel Brown Kyle

  • 960 F.2d 147
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17839
  • 1992 WL 82503
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 23, 1992
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

960 F.2d 147

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Samuel Brown KYLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7668.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 1991

Decided: April 23, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG)

Samuel Brown Kyle, appellant pro se.

Ira Lee Oring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Samuel Brown Kyle appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kyle, Nos. CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG (D. Md. June 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.