Opinion

Defelice v. Board of Education

  • 37 A.D.2d 930
  • 326 N.Y.S.2d 89
  • 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3062
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Nov 4, 1971
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.4%

The opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on January 7, 1971, in so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the application denied. The application is to allow the service of a notice of claim after the expiration of the statutory period in an action for personal injuries by an infant and in his father’s derivative action for loss of services. Special *931 Term granted the application. Defendant’s appeal is limited to the father's action. Aside from infancy, the only grounds for allowing a late filing are mental or physical incapacity (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5). Inability to speak English is not physical incapacity (Matter of Gugliotto v. City of New York, 10 A D 2d 986, affd. 9 N Y 2d 738). Nor does the exception of infancy in the infant’s action accrue to the benefit of the father in 2d 943; Matter of McAllister v. New York City Housing Auth., 21 A D 2d the derivative action (Jefferson v. New York City Housing Auth., 24 A D 660). There is no general discretion vested in .the court aside from the statutory exceptions whether or not prejudice is shown. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.