Opinion
The opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to third-party plaintiff-respondent against third-party defendant-appellant. The exclusion of the prior inconsistent statement was improper but on the whole record the exclusion was not prejudicial. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.