Opinion

Brown v. Barron

  • 23 A.D.3d 1125
  • 803 N.Y.S.2d 489
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Nov 10, 2005
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.2%

The opinion

Appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered March 10, 2004 in a personal injury action. The amended judgment awarded plaintiff $184,350.23 upon a jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that the amended judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: The contention of defendants that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to strike plaintiff’s supplemental bill of particulars alleging new injuries after the note of issue had been filed is not reviewable on this appeal because the motion papers are not included in the record before us. Defendants, as the appellants, “submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences” (Matter of Santoshia L., 202 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1994]; see LeRoi & Assoc. v *1126 Bryant, 309 AD2d 1144 [2003]). We have examined defendants’ remaining contentions and conclude that none requires reversal. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.