Opinion

Jerome Julius Brown v. O.J. Garland, Director, Central State Hospital

  • 944 F.2d 900
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27356
  • 1991 WL 183577
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 20, 1991
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

944 F.2d 900

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jerome Julius BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

O.J. GARLAND, Director, Central State Hospital, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1991.

Decided Sept. 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1918-N)

Jerome Julius Brown, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. Acting pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, the district court ordered appellant to exhaust administrative remedies and to advise the court within 100 days of the result of the administrative proceedings. It warned appellant that failure to advise the court regarding exhaustion would result in dismissal of the action. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice upon expiration of the 100-day period, appellant not having complied with its order.

2

The district court could properly require exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Its dismissal of the action, without prejudice, when appellant failed to comply with its order was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.