Opinion

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

  • 58 N.Y.2d 713
  • 458 N.Y.S.2d 909
  • 444 N.E.2d 1328
  • 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3923
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 2, 1982
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.6%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum in Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment ( 58 NY2d 710 [decided herewith]). In view of the additional arguments advanced by petitioner in this proceeding, we add that the Third Department’s rule (22 NYCRR 839.2) is not inconsistent with CPLR 3140, which authorizes its adoption and involves neither an improper delegation of legislative power, nor, petitioner having been afforded the opportunity to file appraisal reports on any ground or grounds it saw fit, any denial of due process of law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Gabrielli taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative in a memorandum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.