Opinion

Galin v. Board of Estimate

  • 52 N.Y.2d 869
  • 437 N.Y.S.2d 80
  • 418 N.E.2d 673
  • 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2191
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 15, 1981
Status
Published
On the bench
Meyer
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 91.7%

"if the other four conditions are mel, acquisition with knowledge of the Zoning Resolution provisions does not const ilute a self-created hardship.”

How later courts described this case

  • "if the other four conditions are mel, acquisition with knowledge of the Zoning Resolution provisions does not const ilute a self-created hardship.”
  • "if the other four conditions are met, acquisition with knowledge of the Zoning Resolution provisions does not constitute a self-created hardship."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Arnold L. Fein at the Appellate Division ( 72 AD2d 114 ).

*871 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones. Judge Meyer dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judges Wachtler and Fuchs-berg concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.