Opinion

Claim of Holck v. Town of Hempstead—District No. 2

  • 47 N.Y.2d 993
  • 420 N.Y.S.2d 211
  • 394 N.E.2d 281
  • 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2233
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jul 10, 1979
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.1%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Claimant was injured while playing soccer outside his place of employment during a lunch break. His claim for compensation was disallowed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the Appellate Division affirmed.

There is no basis for disturbing the board’s decision. Whether claimant’s noontime recreational activity was an incident of employment so as to arise out of and in the course of employment is a question of fact (see, e.g., Matter of Brown v United Servs. for Air, 298 NY 901 , affg 273 App Div 932 ; Matter of Beiring v Niagara Frontier Tr. System, 23 AD2d 611 , mot for lv to app den 15 NY2d 485 ; Matter of Wilson v General Motors Corp., 272 App Div 845 ). It cannot be said on this record that the determination of the board is unsupported by substantial evidence.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, *995 Wachtler and Meyer concur in memorandum; Judge Fuchs-berg taking no part.

Order affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.