Opinion

Claim of O'Reilly v. Raymond Concrete Piling, Inc.

  • 47 N.Y.2d 891
  • 419 N.Y.S.2d 475
  • 393 N.E.2d 470
  • 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2159
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 14, 1979
Status
Published
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 74.3%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

To obtain reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund, a compensation carrier bears the burden of demonstrating that a disability occurring subsequent to a permanent physical impairment resulted in a permanent disability caused by both conditions and which is materially and substantially greater because of the prior impairment than it would have been alone. (Worker’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd 8; Matter of Grieco v Grieco Elec. Co., 52 AD2d 1011 .) In the instant case, substantial evidence exists in the record to support the board’s determination that appellants failed to meet this burden.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.