Opinion

People v. Crimmins

  • 38 N.Y.2d 407
  • 381 N.Y.S.2d 1
  • 343 N.E.2d 719
  • 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2361
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 22, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Cooke
On the bench
Breitel, Cooke, Fuchsberg
Cited by
80 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.2%

Overruled in part by The People v. Clifford Jones, 24 N.Y.3d 623 (2014)

Later courts went against this

  • Overruled in part by The People v. Clifford Jones, 24 N.Y.3d 623 (2014)

    343 N.E.2d 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975), overruled on other grounds by People v. Jones, 26 N.E.3d 754
    New York Court of AppealsDec 19, 20142 citing opinionsin partRead it

The opinion

Cooke, J.

(concurring). While I concur in the majority opinion affirming the. Appellate Division’s order, which affirmed an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction and for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, I do not retreat in any respect, except for the due regard which must be accorded a prevailing opinion, from the position taken and the dissent which I authored and in which I urged affirmance of an earlier order of the Appellate Division which reversed the judgment of conviction as to the manslaughter count, on the law, and granted a new trial on that count (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 , 243 et seq.). The issues on this appeal and that one are not the same. Here, even if it were reviewable, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the court, in denying the application to vacate the judgment based on newly discovered evidence, abused its discretion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.