Opinion

People ex rel. Sutliff v. Board of Supervisors

  • 26 N.Y.S. 610
  • 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 251
  • 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 888
  • 74 Hun 251
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 6, 1893
Status
Published
Author
Herrick
On the bench
Herrick, Putnam
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

HERRICK, J.,

(concurring in result.) It seems to me that as to many of the items in the relator’s account there is no fee or compensation allowed by law, and that for such he is not entitled to recover under Code Civil Proc. § 3280. The board should also determine what the actual expense has been to the relator in providing the prisoners in his care with food pursuant to the statute. See Birdseye’s St. p. 2301; Laws 1847, c. 460, tit. 1, art. 1, § 8.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.