Opinion

Van Vechten v. Van Vechten

  • 20 N.Y.S. 140
  • 72 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 215
  • 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 511
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 14, 1892
Status
Published
Author
Putnam
On the bench
Herrick, Putnam
Cited by
6 cases

The opinion

Putnam, J.

I “concur in result, ” because I have only had time to examine one of your reasons for reversal, i. e., the reception of the evidence of defendant as to the indorsement, the time it was made, etc. I think, clearly, this was a personal transaction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.