Opinion

People ex rel. Trustees of School-District No. 25 v. Board of Town Auditors

  • 12 N.Y.S. 165
  • 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 324
  • 58 Hun 608
  • 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3376
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 10, 1890
Status
Published
Author
Pratt
On the bench
Pratt
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.3%

The opinion

Pratt, J.

The opinion at special term so fully discusses all the questions •of law and fact involved in this matter that it seems useless to write another opinion which must necessarily go over the same ground. Indeed, unless the decision of the state superintendent is res adjudioata upon the whole matter, it is doubtful that the relators are legally or equitably entitled to the moneys sought to be recovered here, from the fact that the report upon which the so-called “corrected apportionment” was made is claimed to be informal, irregular, and false. If the relators have any remedy it is by an action in which -all the facts may be conclusively settled. Order affirmed, upon the opinion -rendered below.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.