Opinion

Small v. Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co.

10 N.Y.S. 456
32 N.Y. St. Rep. 887
57 Hun 587
1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2168

Court: New York Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 6, 1890
Status: Published
Author: Brunt
On the bench: Brunt, Daniels
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

"Van Brunt, J.

I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Daniels. There is another reason why the order appealed from is correct. The plaintiff is a non-resident of this state; the defendant the Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co., a necessary defendant, is a foreign corporation; and this action is brought to restrain action by this foreign corporation. The courts of this state have no jurisdiction of such a cause of action. The parties should settle their difficulties in the place of their residence.

Brady, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.