Opinion

Hœpfner v. Sevestre

  • 10 N.Y.S. 51
  • 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 296
  • 56 Hun 640
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 14, 1890
Status
Published
Author
Brady
On the bench
Barrett, Brady
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Brady, J.

I concur on the ground that the title by adverse possession was sufficiently made out.

APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF MOTION TO SUBMIT FURTHER FINDINGS.

Barrett, J.

In view of the decision upon the main appeal from the judgment, it would be unprofitable to consider the question of practice here presented. This appeal should therefore be dismissed as unnecessary, without costs. All concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.