Opinion

Pelaez v. Silverstone

  • 19 N.Y.3d 954
  • 950 N.Y.S.2d 101
  • 2012 NY Slip Op 77483
  • 973 N.E.2d 199
  • 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 1869
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 28, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal purportedly on behalf of Silverbrook Farm, Inc. dismissed upon the ground that Silverbrook Farm, Inc. must appear by an attorney (see CPLR 321 [a]); motion, insofar as Alan Silverstone and Janice Silver-stone seek leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying reconsideration or full Board review, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal by Alan Silverstone and Janice Silverstone otherwise denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.