Opinion

William Brown Burch v. United States

  • 911 F.2d 731
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23870
  • 1990 WL 118659
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Aug 15, 1990
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.9%

The opinion

911 F.2d 731

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

William Brown BURCH, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6058.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 15, 1990.

1

Before WELLFORD and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges, and BELL, District Judge. *

ORDER

2

This pro se federal prisoner appeals the district court's order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . He has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. The appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Following a jury trial, William Brown Burch was convicted on federal charges involving kidnapping and rape. Prior to sentencing, Burch's counsel alerted the trial court that another individual had confessed to the crimes. After a brief colloquy concerning whether the matter should be investigated, the confession was made part of the record. Burch was sentenced to life imprisonment; his sentence was later reduced to thirty-five years.

4

In his motion to vacate sentence, Burch alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to move for a new trial following discovery of the confession.

5

Upon review, we conclude that defense counsel's performance was neither deficient nor prejudicial to the outcome of the trial. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).

6

Accordingly, the motion for appointment of counsel is denied and the district court's order is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Sam H. Bell, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.