Opinion

DeBeerski v. Paige

  • 47 Barb. 172
  • 1866 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 109
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 5, 1866
Status
Published
Author
Ingalls
On the bench
Hogeboom, Ingalls, Miller
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.4%

The opinion

Ingalls, J. I concur.

1. The contract is entire; and being void as to the land, was also void as to the other subjects embraced therein.

2. It is inoperative for want of mutuality. (Lester v. *177 Jewett, 12 Barb. 502 .) In the above case the words “value received” are used, which is equivalent to “one dollar.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.