Opinion

Board of Education v. Watson

  • 63 Cal. 2d 829
  • 48 Cal. Rptr. 481
  • 409 P.2d 481
  • 1966 Cal. LEXIS 332
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 11, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Peters
On the bench
Mosk, Peters
Cited by
56 cases

The opinion

PETERS, J.

I.dissent. I would deny the petition for the

writ of mandate because in my opinion section 20811 of the Education Code is unconstitutional for the reasons set forth by Mr. Justice pro tern. Frampton * in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in Board of Education v. Watson (Cal.App.) 45 Cal.Rptr. 72 .

Traynor, C. J., concurred.

Assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.