Opinion

Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

58 Cal. 2d 142
23 Cal. Rptr. 592
373 P.2d 640
1962 Cal. LEXIS 248

Court: California Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 19, 1962
Status: Published
Author: McComb
On the bench: McComb, Peters
Cited by: 122 cases

provisions required by statute will be read into insurance policy

How later courts described this case

provisions required by statute will be read into insurance policy

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McCOMB, J.

I dissent. I would affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed by Mr. Justice Fourt in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in Interinsurance Exchange v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co., (Cal.App.) 17 Cal.Rptr. 259 .

Respondent’s petition for a rehearing was denied August 15, 1962. McComb, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.