Opinion

Emeric v. Alvarado

  • 64 Cal. 529
  • 8 P.C.L.J. 1018
  • 2 P. 418
  • 1884 Cal. LEXIS 419
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 31, 1884
Status
Published
Author
Sharpstein
On the bench
McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton
Cited by
83 cases

holding appeal of order appointing a receiver was not “a special order made after final judgment” because no final order had entered

How later courts described this case

  • holding appeal of order appointing a receiver was not “a special order made after final judgment” because no final order had entered

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Sharpstein, J., concurring.

being the opinion of the majority of my brethren that the findings of the court below, with the exceptions specified by Mr. Justice Thornton, ought not to be disturbed, I concur in the foregoing judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.