Opinion

McCormick v. Brown

  • 36 Cal. 180
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 15, 1868
Status
Published
Author
Sawyer
On the bench
Rhodes, Sawyer
Cited by
62 cases

The opinion

Sawyer, C. J., concurring:

I concur in the judgment, and in the views expressed in the opinion. I also think that the only promise found in the letters of the defendant is conditional, and that there is no intent or willingness to pay, even to the extent as to amount and terms of the promise, without a previous performance by the plaintiff of the conditions indicated, viz: a discharge of the judgment of record in Illinois, and a surrender to the defendant of the instrument upon which the judgment was obtained. An anxiety and persistent determination to accomplish this purpose, as a condition of the promise, is clearly manifest in all the letters of the defendant. There is no evidence of the performance of these conditions, and the conditional promise, without such performance, is ineffectual to take the case out of the bar of the statute.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.