reasoning that because a resignation need not be accepted to take effect, it is irrevocable when tendered, even if it will not take effect until a future date
How later courts described this case
- reasoning that because a resignation need not be accepted to take effect, it is irrevocable when tendered, even if it will not take effect until a future date
- affirming discipline for attorney who failed to prevent 27 unethical acts by his staff
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray.
I dissent from the foregoing opinion, for the reasons expressed by me in the case of The People v. Brenham, 3 Cal. Reports.