Opinion

Slattery v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment

  • 246 A.D. 296
  • 285 N.Y.S. 768
  • 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9492
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Feb 14, 1936
Status
Published
Author
Townley
On the bench
Glennon, Townley
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

Townley, J. (dissenting).

I dissent on the following grounds: (1) The New York city employees’ retirement system is a separate corporation and is not bound by the prior adjudication; (2) the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York as *301 respondent in this action is a party answering in the capacity of trustees of a separate corporation and its funds and not as an employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Law; (3) the evidence presented to the respondent justified the finding that Colonel Slattery did not meet his death by accident; and (4) the funds out of which the pension is to be paid are funds of the New York city employees’ retirement system (Greater N. Y. Charter, § 1707; Report on the Pension Funds of City of New York, vol. 3, pp. 15, 16).

The order of certiorari should be dismissed and the determination of the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York confirmed.

Untermyer, J., concurs.

Order of certiorari sustained, the determination of the respondent annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner, and the respondent directed to accept as final and conclusive the findings of the State Industrial Board, as affirmed by the Appellate Division, Third Department, and award a pension to the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of section 1718 of the charter.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.