Opinion

Brown v. Phelan

  • 223 A.D. 393
  • 228 N.Y.S. 466
  • 1928 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6222
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Apr 27, 1928
Status
Published
Author
McAvoy
On the bench
McAvoy, Merrell
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

McAvoy, J.

(dissenting). These trustees who have been directed to account for the peculations of their cotrustee occupied to him and to this estate, with the acquiescence of their cestuis que trustent, the state of passive trustees who cannot be held responsible for what the defaulting trustee has received and converted. They have never known of or assented to the misapplications. They have not consented to the waste. They have neglected no duty consequent upon their knowledge of a misapplication accomplished or projected. These are necessary grounds of liability, not found in the proof.

The judgment should, therefore, be reversed except as to the proceeds of the Van Rensselaer note.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs, respondents, against the defendants James T. Phelan and John M. Phelan, individually and as trustees, etc., of James J. Phelan, deceased.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.