Opinion
The opinion
The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided b.y a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents, being of opinion that the fact that the property was subjected to regulation as a public utility does not constitute an incumbrance.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.