Opinion

Katterschinsky v. Board of Education

  • 215 A.D. 695
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Oct 15, 1925
Status
Published
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.9%

The opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to the board of education in the discharge of its governmental functions. (Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196 ; Johnson v. Board of Education, 210 App. Div. 723 .) The charge here is not that the board of education, as such, was negligent, but that the negligent act was that of the teachers in charge of the athletic exercises that were being conducted in the court yard of the school. We do not, however, intimate that there was negligence on the part of the teachers in charge. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.