Opinion

Bruce Lamont McNeil v. Superintendent Hayes, Disciplinary Board

  • 873 F.2d 1439
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5650
  • 1989 WL 42557
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 27, 1989
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

873 F.2d 1439

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bruce Lamont MCNEIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Superintendent HAYES, Disciplinary Board, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7051.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 28, 1989.

Decided April 27, 1989.

Bruce Lamont McNeil, appellant pro se.

Lacy Herman Thornburg, Attorney General, Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Bruce Lamont McNeil appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNeil v. Hayes, C/A No. 88-224-CRT (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.