Opinion

In re Merow

  • 112 A.D. 562
  • 99 N.Y.S. 9
  • 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 726
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
May 2, 1906
Status
Published
Author
Kruse
On the bench
Kruse, McLennan, Spring
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

Kruse, J. (concurring):

I concur in the opinion of the presiding justice save in one respect. I think the ballot should have Contained the.numbering and heading of the questions as stated in section 16 of the Liquor Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 112, as amd. by Laws of 1905, chap. 680), but the omission of the election -officers 'to furnish ballots of that description did not of itself invalidate the election, and is not sufficient to warrant ordering a new election in view of the fact that the voters were not misled and the election affected thereby.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.