Opinion

Piatt v. Piatt

  • 32 Idaho 407
  • 184 P. 470
  • 1919 Ida. LEXIS 62
Court
Idaho Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 30, 1919
Status
Published
Author
Morgan
On the bench
Budge, Morgan, Rice
Cited by
32 cases

The opinion

MORGAN, C. J.,

Dissenting. — I am in accord with the rules of law announced in the foregoing opinion, but am unable, by a very thorough search of the record, to find any evidence corroborating the testimony of respondent, nor any testimony which amounts to proof of an admission by appellant that he accused respondent of infidelity to him. The judgment of the trial court should be reversed because it is based upon the uncorroborated testimony of respondent, which testimony is insufficient when measured by the provision of C. L., sec. 2661, quoted in the majority opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.