“[T]he Venters have identified and are arguing for a class of which they are not a member and, therefore, they have no standing . . . .”
How later courts described this case
- “[T]he Venters have identified and are arguing for a class of which they are not a member and, therefore, they have no standing . . . .”
- attorney from neighboring county had de facto authority to prosecute when district court appointed him and the responsible prosecutor stated he could not attend to his duties
- even if the trial court mistakenly appointed a special prosecutor, his acts were those of an officer de facto and were entitled to recognition as such
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON REHEARING.
HUSTON, C. J.
We have considered the petition for a rehearing filed in this ease. There is no question presented by the petition which has not been fully and repeatedly presented to and passed upon by this court. A reiteration of our conclusions would add nothing to their force, and a detailed review of the questions presented by the petition would be but an act of supererogation. The petition for a rehearing is denied.
Quarles and Sullivan, JJ., concur.