Opinion

Brown v. Brown

  • 854 P.2d 732
  • 1993 WL 261407
Court
Alaska Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 5, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Burke, Compton, Matthews, Moore, Witz
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 48.4%

vacating superior court's decision to dismiss case where brief was filed late and instead ordering attorney to pay fees, costs, and $500 fine under Appellate Rule 510

How later courts described this case

  • vacating superior court's decision to dismiss case where brief was filed late and instead ordering attorney to pay fees, costs, and $500 fine under Appellate Rule 510

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER NO. 28

Appellant Wendy Brown’s motion for full court consideration of the order of December 24, 1992, denying her motion for a ten-day extension for filing her brief and dismissing her appeal has been considered by the full court. This is appellant’s fifth request for a extension of time within which to file her opening brief. The prior requests were granted; however, the fourth request was granted with the notation that “no further extensions will be granted.” Appellant’s counsel, Gary Foster, claims that the fifth request was necessitated by an “unexpected major and preemptive disruption of his schedule, thereby necessitating another non-routine ten-day extension.” Although Foster’s showing is not without some plausibility, the court concludes that Foster has not appropriately planned his schedule or marshalled his resources and that with appropriate planning and marshalling of resources, appellant’s brief could have been filed without the necessity for a fifth extension of time: The court concludes that Foster rather than appellant should bear the cost of his derelictions. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The motion is granted. The dismissal of the appeal is vacated and appellant’s opening brief, which has been lodged, shall be filed on March 26, 1993, conditioned on the following:

(1) Foster shall personally pay a $500 fine under Appellate Rule 510(c) and

(2) Foster shall personally pay appel-lee’s actual reasonable fees and costs incurred in opposing the motion for the fifth extension of time and in opposing the present motion for full court reconsideration; such fees and costs shall be assessed by the clerk of court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.