Opinion

State v. Shoultz

  • 564 P.2d 257
  • 1977 OK CR 174
  • 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 519
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
May 16, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Brett
On the bench
Bussey, Brett, Bliss
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.6%

The opinion

BRETT, Judge,

specially concurs.

While I concur in this decision, I do not give my approval to Cory v. State, Okl.Cr., 543 P.2d 565 (1975). However, for the purpose of preliminary examination, I believe the testimony was sufficient to bind over the defendant to stand trial. It is presumed that the proper test of the substance will be shown at trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.