Opinion

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chronister

76 O.B.A.J. 1330
114 P.3d 455
2005 OK CIV APP 32
2004 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 114
2005 WL 1349102

Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed: Sep 2, 2004
Status: Published
Author: Buettner
On the bench: Adams, Buettner, Jones
Cited by: 2 cases

The opinion

BUETTNER, V.C.J./P.J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part:

I agree with the majority opinion except for the decision regarding the van. I am not convinced that 85 O.S.2001 § 14(A)(1) provides authority to compel an employer to provide a van under the term “apparatus as may be necessary after the injury.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.