Opinion

Hazel v. Edwards

  • 199 Okla. 169
  • 184 P.2d 981
  • 1947 OK 254
  • 1947 Okla. LEXIS 615
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Sep 23, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Hurst
On the bench
Davison, Riley, Bay-Less, Corn, Gibson, Hurst
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

HURST, C.J.

(dissenting). I am of the opinion that under the proviso to 12 O.S. 1941 §954, this court may and should make Strange a party on such terms as may be just, and that the decisions relied upon in the majority opinion were in error in not giving effect to said proviso.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.