Opinion

Reilley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Dec 20, 2021
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-0798V

UNPUBLISHED

KEVIN REILLEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: November 18, 2021

v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder

Injury Related to Vaccine

Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Heather Varney Menezes, Shaheen & Gordon, P.A., Manchester, NH, for Petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On July 1, 2020, Kevin Reilley filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

(“SIRVA”) after an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 31, 2018. Petition at 3. This case

was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 17, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner

entitled to compensation for his shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

(“SIRVA”). On November 18, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation

(“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $58,366.13, which is comprised of

$57,500.00 in damages for pain and suffering and $866.13 as compensation for

Petitioner’s actual unreimbursed medical expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer,

1

Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from

public access.

2

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on

the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump

sum payment of $58,366.13 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint f iling of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

KEVIN REILLEY,

Petitioner, No. 20-798V

Chief Special Master Corcoran

v. SPU

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Procedural History and Items of Compensation

On September 17, 2021, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, and conceded that

entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on

that same day, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner

was entitled to vaccine compensation for his left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (“SIRVA”). ECF Doc. 25. Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers

that petitioner should be awarded $58,366.13, which is comprised of damages for pain and

suffering ($57,500.00) and unreimbursed medical expenses ($866.13). This amount represents

all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.

1

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court

for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings

and future pain and suffering.

1

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through

a lump sum payment of $58,366.13, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner

agrees.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Acting Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO

Acting Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN

Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

LARA A. ENGLUND

Assistant Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ Mallori B. Openchowski

MALLORI B. OPENCHOWSKI

Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-0146

Tel.: (202) 305-0660

mallori.b.openchowski@usdoj.gov

DATED: November 18, 2021

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.